  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Search The Site... 
  
  
  
  
Things To Do... 
  
Reply in this thread 
  
Start a new thread 
  
Share this thread 
  
See other threads 
  
  
  
 | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
Digital Electronics Message Board 
555 Won't "Time Out"
 | 
  | 
 
 
 
| 
   Bookmark or Share This Thread     
555 Won't "Time Out"  |  
I'm trying to drive a relay using the 555 chip (actually RS NE5567).  The power supply is regulated 6 volts, 1 amp and the relay runs on 5 volts.  Relay is polarity sensitive, has 175 ohms across coil, and draws 32 ma (both as measured).
  I'm using a 1 meg resistor with a 10 mfd cap and it times out beautifully at 11 seconds using an LED/150 ohm resistor on pin 3/gnd.  However, when using the relay, it does not time out and stays latched until reset or power is cut.
  I've tried a diode across the resistor and/or added more resistance to no avail.
  Any ideas?
  Relay is a OMRON 1574Y1, G6H-2, 5 vdc  |  
Posted by Anonymous  on 17/07/2003, at 19:38 GMT  |  
Suggestions to cure 555 monostable timeout failure  |  
The problem is probably feedback through the power supply as the relay as switched off. There will be a small but sudden change in the supply voltage which may be confusing the 555 comparators. 
  These are some things to try:
  1. Check that you have a signal diode (reversed biased) across the relay coil, eg 1N4148.
  2. Add a 0.1uF capacitor across the power supply near the 555. This is in addition to the smoothing capacitor(s) already present on the supply.
  3. Add a 0.1uF capacitor in parallel across the relay coil.
  4. Try changing the timing components to a 100k ohm resistor and a 100uF capacitor. Lower value timing resistors tend to make the 555 less sensitive to noise and they make any leakage in the electrolytic capacitor less significant.
   |  
Posted by John Hewes  on 18/07/2003, at 15:21 GMT  |  
Thanks  |  
Thanks, after further experimentation I found that a 10 mfd NP cap across the relay coil solved the problem and the system now works fine as intended with the 11 second delay.
  Thanks again.  |  
Posted by Anonymous  on 18/07/2003, at 17:20 GMT  |  
 
 | 
 
 
 
 |